Good Morning, and Happy Saturday! Welcome to The Flag's Five, your nonpartisan breakdown of the week’s five most pressing headlines. Dive into what happened, why it matters, and how perspectives from the left and right shape the conversation.

Want more? Upgrade today to unlock The Flag's Sunday Edition, where we uncover fascinating American historical stories—and enjoy an ad-free reading experience while you're at it. History, clarity, and no interruptions await!

1. Biden’s Farewell

• Here's what happened: On Wednesday evening, President Joe Biden delivered his farewell address from the Oval Office, reflecting on his administration's achievements and warning of threats to American democracy. He highlighted concerns about political polarization, the rise of authoritarianism, and the influence of corporate power. Biden called for unity and a commitment to democratic values while addressing challenges like climate change and global instability. (Chris Megerian and Colleen Long, AP)

• Here's why it matters: The speech underscored the divisions Biden sought to address throughout his presidency, offering a sobering reminder of the challenges the U.S. continues to face. His critique of corporate influence and political extremism resonated with some but was dismissed by others as overly partisan. This polarized reception reflects the entrenched divisions Biden aimed to bridge. (Joseph Gedeon, The Guardian)

• Here's what left-leaning sources are saying about this: Progressive voices lauded Biden’s speech for addressing systemic issues like the "tech-industrial complex" and the dangers of oligarchy. They argued his warnings about corporate overreach and threats to democracy were timely and crucial. Many on the left praised Biden for using his final address to challenge Americans to confront these pressing issues. (Anthony L. Fisher, MSNBC)

• Here's what right-leaning sources are saying about this: Critics on the right dismissed Biden’s farewell address as emblematic of his presidency—long-winded and unconvincing. Some commentators argued the speech was less about unity and more a final attempt to deflect responsibility for deepening political divides. They emphasized what they saw as Biden's failure to resonate with everyday Americans. (Elle Purnell, The Federalist)

Sponsored by Rex Shares

The T-REX 2X/-2X Long and Inverse Bitcoin Daily Target ETFs

Whether you're bullish 🐂 or bearish 🐻 on Bitcoin, T-REX ETFs (BTCL and BTCZ) provide the first leveraged ETFs designed to give you exposure to spot Bitcoin ETPs. Seek a leveraged position that aligns with your market outlook without directly investing in spot Bitcoin ETPs.

Learn More

Investing in these funds is not equivalent to investing directly in bitcoin. High risk involved. Not suitable for all investors. Distributor: Foreside Fund Services LLC.

2. Red Dye No. 3 Banned

• Here's what happened: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has banned the use of Red Dye No. 3 in food and ingested drugs following studies linking the synthetic additive to cancer in male rats. Companies have until January 2027 to reformulate products to comply. The dye, which has been banned in cosmetics since 1990, is also outlawed in many countries but remains legal for some imported goods in the U.S. (Mary Whitfill Roeloffs, Forbes)

• Here's why it matters: Red Dye No. 3 has been a controversial additive for decades due to its links to cancer in animals, sparking debates about food safety and federal oversight. While some manufacturers have already transitioned to natural alternatives, consumer groups argue that the FDA's delayed action highlights systemic flaws in addressing harmful additives. (AP)

• Here's what left-leaning sources are saying about this: Progressive voices praised the FDA's move but criticized the decades-long delay in banning a dye already outlawed in many countries. Advocates called for a comprehensive review of all synthetic dyes and additives to ensure public health and questioned why safety measures in the U.S. lag behind international standards. (Andrew Jacobs and Teddy Rosenbluth, The New York Times)

• Here's what right-leaning sources are saying about this: Right-leaning commentators framed the FDA's decision as a long-overdue but limited action that doesn't address broader concerns about regulatory inefficiencies. Some highlighted that regulatory overreach, if unchecked, could strain manufacturers and lead to higher costs for consumers. (NewsMax)

3. SCOTUS Upholds TikTok Ban

• Here's what happened: The Supreme Court upheld a federal law mandating that TikTok's China-based parent company, ByteDance, sell its U.S. operations or face a ban. The deadline for compliance is January 19, just before President-elect Donald Trump’s inauguration. The Biden administration has opted not to enforce the law, leaving the final decision to Trump, who is reportedly considering a temporary suspension of enforcement. (Breanne Deppisch, Fox News)

• Here's why it matters: The decision has profound implications for free speech, data privacy, and U.S.-China relations. Proponents of the law argue that ByteDance poses a national security risk due to its potential obligation to share data with the Chinese government. Critics worry about the ban’s impact on free expression and its precedent for regulating technology companies. The bipartisan support for the law reflects growing concerns about Chinese influence, but the controversy remains polarizing. (Zach Schonfeld and Julia Shapero, The Hill)

• Here's what left-leaning sources are saying about this: Left-leaning commentators focus on the broader implications for free speech and the uncertainties surrounding enforcement. They note concerns over government overreach and highlight calls for more nuanced strategies to address security risks without undermining digital platforms used by millions of Americans. (John Fritze et al., CNN)

• Here's what right-leaning sources are saying about this: Right-leaning outlets highlight opposition to the ban within conservative circles, such as Senator Rand Paul’s criticism labeling it as "authoritarian." They also emphasize national security risks associated with ByteDance and argue that strong measures are needed to protect American user data and counter Chinese influence. (Luke Gentile, Washington Examiner)

4. Israel-Hamas Ceasefire

• Here's what happened: Israel’s security cabinet approved a ceasefire deal with Hamas following weeks of negotiations. The agreement includes a prisoner and hostage exchange, with Israel securing the release of captured civilians in exchange for Palestinian prisoners held by Israel. The deal, brokered by Egypt and Qatar, aims to pause the violence that escalated last October. (James Hider and Jerome Socolovsky, NPR)

• Here's why it matters: The ceasefire marks a temporary halt to one of the deadliest conflicts in recent years, offering a chance for de-escalation and humanitarian aid to reach Gaza. However, experts caution that deep-seated tensions and unresolved issues could reignite violence, while the terms of the deal have drawn criticism from both sides. (Laura Kelly, The Hill)

• Here's what left-leaning sources are saying about this: Progressives argue that the ceasefire was tainted by the involvement of leaders like Trump and Netanyahu, whom they see as prioritizing political gains over genuine peace. Critics claim the deal perpetuates cycles of violence by failing to address the broader humanitarian crisis in Gaza. (Simon Tisdall, The Guardian)

• Here's what right-leaning sources are saying about this: Conservatives have criticized the ceasefire as a short-sighted and costly deal, arguing it emboldens Hamas while failing to ensure long-term security for Israel. Some have expressed frustration with the concessions made by Prime Minister Netanyahu, questioning whether this approach will prevent future violence. (The Editors, National Review)

Sponsored by Rex Shares

The T-REX 2X/-2X Long and Inverse Bitcoin Daily Target ETFs

Whether you're bullish 🐂 or bearish 🐻 on Bitcoin, T-REX ETFs (BTCL and BTCZ) provide the first leveraged ETFs designed to give you exposure to spot Bitcoin ETPs. Seek a leveraged position that aligns with your market outlook without directly investing in spot Bitcoin ETPs.

Learn More

Investing in these funds is not equivalent to investing directly in bitcoin. High risk involved. Not suitable for all investors. Distributor: Foreside Fund Services LLC.

5. What is the Cause of the LA Fires?

• Here's what happened: Investigations into the Los Angeles wildfires are ongoing, with authorities exploring multiple causes. At least five individuals have been charged with arson since the fires began on January 7. Officials are also examining whether a fire ignited by a firework on January 1 and later fanned by winds could have played a role, though some experts are skeptical. Investigators are also assessing a utility pole as a potential ignition source for the Eaton Fire. (Adiel Kaplan et al., NBC News)

• Here's why it matters: The wildfires have raised questions about preparedness, infrastructure, and accountability. With thousands displaced and vast areas destroyed, the crisis highlights California's vulnerabilities to natural and human-made disasters. Concerns over arson, outdated infrastructure, and policy decisions have intensified debates on how best to address fire prevention and response. (Crystal Hayes, BBC News)

• Here's what left-leaning sources are saying about this: Progressive voices have focused on environmental and human impacts, suggesting that the fires may stem from a combination of arson and systemic failures in managing infrastructure and natural resources. Some argue that the lack of preparation for extreme weather events is emblematic of broader governance challenges. (Richard Winton, Noah Goldberg, and Hannah Fry, Los Angeles Times)

• Here's what right-leaning sources are saying about this: Conservatives have criticized California’s leadership, attributing the wildfires to mismanagement and misplaced priorities, such as budget cuts to fire departments and environmental policies that prioritize wildlife over human needs. Critics argue that progressive policies have left the state unprepared for disasters of this magnitude. (Elizabeth Stauffer, Washington Examiner)

Sunday Sneak Peak

🐻 Jefferson’s “bear-garden” was more than just political shade—it housed actual bears. What prompted this peculiar presidential move?

Discover the untamed tale in The Flag. Subscribe today!