- THE FLAG
- Posts
- đşđ¸ Ohio's Choice
đşđ¸ Ohio's Choice
Plus, how many people does it take to toast sâmores?
Good morning, and happy Thursday. A four-legged bodyguard comes to the rescue! This Connecticut family's home security camera captured the moment a black bear approached a 4-year-old boy â and ended up chased off by the family dog.
Plus, A Texas-based company broke a Guinness World Record by gathering 891 people to make s'mores at the same time.
Also, investing in wine â and no, we donât just mean buying bulk at Costco.
TRENDING
Right: Bank Records Show $20 Million to Biden-Tied Businesses Steven Nelson, NY Post
Right: The Special Counsel Broke Into Trump's Twitter Account Katie Pavlich, Townhall
Right: Biden Needs To Stop Lying to Gold Star Families Elle Purnell, The Federalist
Left: Special Counsel Secured Search Warrant For Trump's Twitter Account Lydia OâConnor, Huff Post
Left: Trump's attack on Chris Christie's weight backfires Gabriella Ferrigine, Salon
Left: Ex-federal judge and prominent conservative: âThere is no Republican Partyâ Shawna Mizelle, CNN
QUICK CLICKS
Feinstein Hospitalized, Hawaiian Wildfires, Nigerian Summit
US: Sen. Dianne Feinstein, 90, falls at home and goes to hospital, but scans are clear (AP)
US: DeSantis suspends Orlando state attorney over 'dereliction of duty' on crime (FOX News)
US: At least 6 killed in wildfires that devastated parts of the Hawaiian island of Maui (AP)
US: FBI fatally shoots man in Utah who allegedly threatened Biden, Alvin Bragg and others (NBC News)
US: Arrest warrants issued for 3 men in massive fight at Montgomery riverfront dock (CNN)
World: Iraq bans media from using term âhomosexualityâ, says they must use âsexual devianceâ (CBS News)
World: Niger junta meets Nigeria envoys ahead of summit with regional leaders (Reuters)
POWERED BY VINT
Whatâs Better Than a 121-Year-Old Bottle of Fine Wine?
How about the returns on fine wine over the past 121 years? They average to 8.5% annually. The fine wine and spirit market provides consistent returns on par with the most notable indexes. And, with Vint, you can own a piece of it.
Through Vint, you can invest in a historically stable alternative asset. Simply browse shares of expert-curated collections of fine wines and rare spirits, buy shares, and receive proceeds when assets sell.
Iâd toast to that đĽ
ABORTION
Ohioâs Choice
On Tuesday, Ohio voters rejected Issue 1, a ballot proposal that looked to make it harder to amend the stateâs constitution. While the measure didnât explicitly deal with the abortion, it was seen as a proxy vote on abortion rights.
Reporting from the Right: Ohio ballot initiative to make it more difficult to amend state constitution fails (FOX News)
Reporting from the Left: Ohio Voters Take First Crucial Step To Protect Abortion Rights Ahead Of November Vote (Huff Post)
From The Flag: If the measure had passed, it would have complicated a separate ballot initiative to enshrine abortion access, which voters will take up in November. Because Issue 1 failed, the threshold to pass future ballot measures will stay at 50% rather than the proposed 60%.
RIGHT-LEANING SENTIMENT
Mixed: âLeftist Impositionâ or âWarning for the GOPâ?
This is not an outright win for abortion rights advocates, as Tuesdayâs measures didnât directly deal with abortion.
Issue 1 would have made it harder for out-of-state organizations to take advantage of ballot proposals to inflict leftist agendas.
This be another warning sign for Republicans that the issue of abortion may hinder their chances of victory in the 2024 elections.
The abortion lobby shouldnât celebrate too quickly in Ohio Hudson Crozier, Washington Examiner: âPresident Joe Biden and abortion advocates are cheering after Ohioans rejected a ballot proposal that would make it harder for voters to pass amendments to the state constitution. The proposal threatened a pro-abortion amendment that will be on a November ballot, and many have declared Tuesdayâs vote a âwin for abortion rights.â ⌠By itself, the vote is not a win for or against abortion. It is a step in a broader plan by the abortion lobby that, as a whole, faces difficult political odds. ⌠Tuesdayâs proposal performed poorly even in conservative districts, according to the Associated Press. Voter turnout was far more enthusiastic in liberal areas, and it seems that many conservatives did not care or had their own reasons for opposing this procedural change for amendments. We cannot infer from this that a mostly red state will adopt a sweeping constitutional right to abortion come November.â
In Ohio, Voters To Decide How Easily Theyâll Let Pro-Abortion Interest Groups Change Their Constitution Jordan Boyd, The Federalist: âTuesdayâs special election is an explicit attempt by the state GOP to prevent an outsider operation like the one executed in Kansas in 2022 from significantly changing Ohioâs political landscape on abortion, parental rights, and even guns, which Cleveland Mayor Justin Bibb has already promised to target via ballot measure. In Kansas, out-of-state donors and special interest groups that opposed a homegrown pro-life amendment raised millions to expand Midwestern abortion operations. Their deliberately deceptive practices led voters to reject a proposal that would have declared there is no constitutional right in Kansas to abortion, taxpayer-funded or otherwise. Ohio voters are already facing their first hurdle in a similar battle. National activist organizations like the ACLU, Planned Parenthood, and various LGBT groups banded together earlier this year to add a ballot proposal that would enshrine abortion up until birth in the state constitution, as well as override parental consent laws for minors seeking irreversible gender experiments.â
One more opinion piece from the Right: What Ohio's vote on constitutional amendment means for Republicans on abortion in 2024 Paul Steinhauser, FOX News
LEFT-LEANING SENTIMENT
Ohioans Stood Up For Their Freedom
The result of this election will have major consequences for Ohio and the country. This is why Republicans scheduled the vote when people were unlikely to pay attention.
Ohioâs voters made it loud and clear theyâre not willing to have their voices and power weakened by the GOP.
This was a brazen attempt to keep a majority of Ohioans from enshrining abortion rights in the state constitution.
The Critical Election Republicans Are Hoping You Wonât Notice Michelle Goldberg, The New York Times: âThe outcome of next Tuesdayâs vote will resonate nationally, because the strategies of both Ohio abortion-rights supporters and opponents are being replicated elsewhere. Throughout the country, reproductive-rights advocates, faced with legislatures that have insulated themselves from the popular will, are turning to referendums to restore some of what was lost when the Supreme Court overturned Roe v. Wade. And throughout the country, abortion opponents understand that to keep abortion illegal, they need to change the rules. ⌠The November ballot initiative to make abortion a constitutional right is a chance for Ohio voters to circumvent their unrepresentative representatives. With this August initiative, the Republicans are working to head off the voters by essentially asking them to disenfranchise themselves. Because most people are unlikely to give up their rights quite so easily, Republicans scheduled the vote at a time when few are paying attention.â
In the Ohio GOPâs scam referendum, the majority backed majority rule E.J. Dionne Jr., The Washington Post: ââWhen you do everything you can to rig an election and still lose, you have a problem. Voters in Ohio told the stateâs Republican Party on Tuesday that it has a big problem, and they sent that message to the GOP nationwide. The outcome is also a major challenge for opponents of abortion. They might come to see the Supreme Courtâs decision overturning Roe v. Wade not as the victory they celebrated in 2022 but as the decisive moment when the politics of the issue turned against them. The combination of hypocrisy and opportunism proved too much for most Ohioans, who defeated the GOP legislatureâs referendum proposal that would have made it far more difficult for future electorates to change the stateâs Constitution. Even though the state voted for Donald Trump by eight points in 2020, a majority refused to accept the Republicansâ invitation to throw away its own power.â
One more opinion piece from the Left: Ohioâs Issue 1 referendum is a proxy fight on abortion Eugene Robinson, The Washington Post
FLAG THIS
So Long Screw Tops, Bulls & Bears, Own the City
đˇ Not every wine investment turns out like Shiv and Tomâs Spätburgunder. With Vint, you can explore curated collections to find and buy shares in the rarest fine wines and spirits. So long, screw tops.
𪺠Howâs your nest egg? Okay? Great to hear. How about your kidsâ? With UNest, building and growing investment accounts for kids has never been simpler. Whether saving for college, buying a car, or simply having âthe Talkâ about the bulls and the bears, UNest makes family investing as easy as downloading an app. Join the family today.
đď¸ Whatâs better than buying commercial real estate? Nada. City buildings are one of the most reliable income streams â and, with Nadaâs cityfunds, you donât have to shell out millions to buy in. Explore diversified real estate portfolios in the nationâs top cities and own a piece of your favorite destination.
FLAG FINDS
Ohioans Opposed Before and After
Before Tuesdayâs vote, polling found 57% of voters were against Issue 1, including some Republicans and opponents of abortion. Twenty-six percent backed the issue, while 17% were undecided (USA TODAY Network/Suffolk University).
Following the vote, those numbers held up. With the count nearly completed, votes cast against the measure received 57% compared to 43% in favor â a lead of almost 430,000 votes (AP News).
WATERCOOLER
London Gets the News, Curing Frustration, A Visa-Free Escape
On This Day in 1776: News reaches London that the Americans had drafted the Declaration of Independence.
The Marginalian: The Stoic Antidote to Frustration
Today I learned Svalbard, Norway is the only visa-free zone in the world. Regardless of citizenship, anyone can live and work there indefinitely.
Reply