- THE FLAG
- Posts
- đşđ¸ Citizenship Clash
đşđ¸ Citizenship Clash
Birthright citizenship in the crosshairs: Trump reignites a constitutional debate.
Good morning and Happy Thursday!
Weâre on the edge of something special: creating a fully reader-funded newsletter! Itâs ambitious, but we believe this community can make it happen.
If you havenât subscribed yet, nowâs the time. Every subscription brings us closer to that goal. Pick your plan:
$3/month: Get access to our Sunday newsletter.
$7/month: Sunday edition + ad-free content.
Hereâs where we stand:
40 total subscription upgrades
20 days to reach 1,000 subscribers
Subscribe today and support the next chapter in The Flagâs story!
TRENDING
Left: Does Latino Shift to Trump Spell Doom for Democrats? Ed Kilgore, New York Magazine
Left: No, Harris Staffers Did Not Run a 'Flawless' Campaign, Jeet Heer, The Nation
Left: Democrats Should Work With DOGE. I Know Where To Start, Rep. Ro Khanna, MSNBC
Right: Eric Adams Wisely Works With Trump on Deportations, Editorial Board, Washington Examiner
Right: Primary a Squish GOP Senator To Encourage the Others, Kurt Schlichter, Townhall
Right: Can the Nation Wait Until Jan. 20? Byron York, Washington Examiner
TRUMP
Citizenship Clash
Todayâs Top Story: President-elect Donald Trump vowed to end birthright citizenship, calling it âridiculous,â but the proposal is expected to face significant legal challenges due to the 14th Amendmentâs protections.
Reporting from the Left: Trump promises to end birthright citizenship: What is it and could he do it? (AP)
Reporting from the Right: Trump: âWe Have to Endâ Birthright Citizenship (Breitbart)
LEFT-LEANING SENTIMENT
Rewriting Who Belongs
The Top Argument From The Left: Trump plans to withhold citizenship from newborn Americans, Hayes Brown, MSNBC: â[Trump and his incoming staffers] subscribe to a worldview that has long rejected the notion that Americaâs white Christian heritage can stand while also freely accepting the children of nonwhite migrants or formerly enslaved Black people as equal citizens under the Constitution. ⌠Trumpâs campaign argued that the change is needed to deter illegal border crossings and prevent whatâs derisively called âanchor babiesâ from acting as a backdoor for undocumented parents to remain. But the requirement would also exclude babies born to parents who are in the U.S. legally but arenât permanent residents. Not only would that exclude babies born to those on temporary work or student visas, but it would also exclude babies born to those whoâve been admitted as refugees or granted political asylum. ⌠Thereâs a danger in even being willing to accept any exceptions in the notion that people born in the United States are citizens. Itâs just a small step from there to requiring citizenship from one parent as a prerequisite; then both parents; then grandparents. America would be transformed from one of the most free and welcoming countries into a âblood and soilâ nation of exclusion, one built on the backs of children whose only crime was being born under Trumpâs second regime.
Honorable Mention #1: Trumpâs Utterly Absurd Take On Birthright Citizenship Involves Walking Infants, Roque Planas, HuffPost
Honorable Mention #2: Trumpâs Birthright-Citizenship Threat Shows His True Target, Ed Kilgore, New York Magazine
RIGHT-LEANING SENTIMENT
Misguided Approach
The Top Argument From The Right: Trumpâs Misguided Attack on Birthright Citizenship, Jason L. Riley, The Wall Street Journal: âMr. Trumpâs insistence to the contrary notwithstanding, more than 30 other countries, including Canada and Mexico, also honor birthright citizenship. More important, itâs doubtful that the policy can be altered by executive order rather than through a constitutional amendment or act of Congress. Critics of birthright citizenship say it doesnât apply to the children of illegal-alien parents, but thatâs not explicit in the text of the amendment, which states that âAll persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the state wherein they reside.â Conservative and liberal legal scholars have argued that even before the 14th Amendment was added in 1868 to grant citizenship to former slaves, it was clear that people born here were considered citizens. âŚending birthright citizenship would almost certainly be at cross-purposes with [Trumpâs] larger goal. Children who automatically become citizens would be counted going forward as illegal, like their parents, and the size of the illegal population would swell by the millions.â
Honorable Mention #1: Trumpâs challenges and implications of ending birthright citizenship on Day One, Anna Giaritelli, Washington Examiner
Honorable Mention #2: Defining âAmericanâ: Birthright Citizenship And The Original Understanding Of The 14th Amendment, James Ho, The Federalist
FLAG THIS
Americans Favor Birthright
Polling conducted last year by the Economist/YouGov found that most Americans support birthright citizenship, despite former Trumpâs vow to end it:
60% of U.S. adults believe citizenship should continue for all born in the U.S., regardless of parental status.
25% oppose continuing the policy, while 15% remain unsure (The Hill).
Birthright citizenship should... |
20 DAYS TO GO
If we get 1,000 paying subscribers by December 31, weâll continue this newsletter in 2025. If we donât, we will discontinue.
We are capitalists, so we will let the market (aka, YOU) decide whether or not this newsletter should live or die.
We have two options for you to choose from:
$3/mo: Youâll get our Sunday newsletter too.
$7/mo: Youâll get our Sunday newsletter and an ad-free experience.
The clock is ticking. We have 20 days to reach 1,000 subscribers.
WATERCOOLER
PA Says Yay, Rent A Friend, Walking Into Tomorrow
On This Day in 1787, Pennsylvania became the second state to ratify the Constitution, by a vote of 46 to 23. Pennsylvania was the first large state to ratify, as well as the first state to endure a serious Anti-Federalist challenge to ratification.
Today I Learned: In the Diomede Islands, you can cross from one day into another.
20 DAYS TO GO
If we get 1,000 paying subscribers by December 31, weâll continue this newsletter in 2025. If we donât, we will discontinue.
We are capitalists, so we will let the market (aka, YOU) decide whether or not this newsletter should live or die.
We have two options for you to choose from:
$3/mo: Youâll get our Sunday newsletter too.
$7/mo: Youâll get our Sunday newsletter and an ad-free experience.
The clock is ticking. We have 20 days to reach 1,000 subscribers.
Reply